Discovering Data
  • Home
  • Blog

Follow up on the US election

11/13/2016

0 Comments

 
Most people, including me, got it wrong but interestingly my low tech prediction based on Ohio was more accurate than all the fancy complex models used by the experts. I think organisations such as FiveThirtyEight missed some of the indicators that pointed to a possible Trump win. In my last post I mentioned Ohio polls which clearly indicated a drop in support for Clinton in the last 10 days or so of the campaign. Florida also shows a similar pattern. These states were important, without them Trump could never have won.
Picture
Clinton (blue) and Trump were very close for most of October, but in the last week or so of the campaign there was a clear separation with Clinton's support dropping (the trend is less clear than the Ohio graph). 

A number of people are saying that the polls got it wrong but most national polls showed Clinton with a small lead - this was accurate as she did win the popular vote. The problem for Clinton was - you don't win the US presidential election by winning the popular vote, you have to win the electoral college vote. 
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    June 2018
    December 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Blog